5-Year Prognostic Value of Quantitative Versus Visual MPI in Subtle Perfusion Defects: Results From REFINE SPECT
This study compared the ability of automated myocardial perfusion imaging analysis to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) to that of visual analysis. Quantitative analysis has not been compared with clinical visual analysis in prognostic studies. A total of 19,495 patients from the multicent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JACC. Cardiovascular imaging 2020-03, Vol.13 (3), p.774-785 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study compared the ability of automated myocardial perfusion imaging analysis to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) to that of visual analysis.
Quantitative analysis has not been compared with clinical visual analysis in prognostic studies.
A total of 19,495 patients from the multicenter REFINE SPECT (REgistry of Fast Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with NExt generation SPECT) study (64 ± 12 years of age, 56% males) undergoing stress Tc-99m-labeled single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging were followed for 4.5 ± 1.7 years for MACE. Perfusion abnormalities were assessed visually and categorized as normal, probably normal, equivocal, or abnormal. Stress total perfusion deficit (TPD), quantified automatically, was categorized as TPD = 0%, TPD >0% to |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1876-7591 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.02.028 |