Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?
Objective To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors. Methods Multiple b value DWIs and DKIs were performed in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2019-12, Vol.29 (12), p.6930-6939 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors.
Methods
Multiple
b
value DWIs and DKIs were performed in 180 patients with renal tumors, which were divided into clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), non-ccRCC, and benign renal tumor group. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (
D
), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (
D
*), perfusion fraction (
f
), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated. The diagnostic efficacy of various diffusion parameters for predicting malignant renal tumors was compared.
Results
The ADC,
D
, and MD values of ccRCCs were higher, while
D
*,
f
, and MK values were lower than those of benign renal tumors (all
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00330-019-06240-6 |