Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

Objective To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors. Methods Multiple b value DWIs and DKIs were performed in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2019-12, Vol.29 (12), p.6930-6939
Hauptverfasser: Ding, Yuqin, Tan, Qinxuan, Mao, Wei, Dai, Chenchen, Hu, Xiaoyi, Hou, Jun, Zeng, Mengsu, Zhou, Jianjun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors. Methods Multiple b value DWIs and DKIs were performed in 180 patients with renal tumors, which were divided into clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), non-ccRCC, and benign renal tumor group. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity ( D ), pseudo-diffusion coefficient ( D *), perfusion fraction ( f ), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated. The diagnostic efficacy of various diffusion parameters for predicting malignant renal tumors was compared. Results The ADC, D , and MD values of ccRCCs were higher, while D *, f , and MK values were lower than those of benign renal tumors (all p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-019-06240-6