Precision of determining bone pose and marker position in the foot and lower leg from computed tomography scans: How low can we go in radiation dose?

•The radiation dose of a CT scan of the foot and ankle can be reduced by a factor 3.•Precision in detecting marker and bone pose does not differ between 150 and 50 mAs.•Bone pose can be detected with a mean absolute error of 0.13 mm and 0.70°.•Marker positions in a CT scan can be detected with a mea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical engineering & physics 2019-07, Vol.69, p.147-152
Hauptverfasser: Schallig, W., van den Noort, J.C., Kleipool, R.P., Dobbe, J.G.G., van der Krogt, M.M., Harlaar, J., Maas, M., Streekstra, G.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The radiation dose of a CT scan of the foot and ankle can be reduced by a factor 3.•Precision in detecting marker and bone pose does not differ between 150 and 50 mAs.•Bone pose can be detected with a mean absolute error of 0.13 mm and 0.70°.•Marker positions in a CT scan can be detected with a mean absolute error of 0.10 mm. Computed tomography (CT) imaging can be used to determine bone pose, sometimes combined with skin-mounted markers. For this specific application, a lower radiation dose than the conventional clinical dose might suffice. This study aims to determine how lowering the radiation dose of a CT-scan of the ankle and foot affects the precision of detecting bone pose and marker position. Radiation dose is proportional to tube charge. Hence, an adult cadaveric leg was scanned 10 times at four different tube charges (150, 75, 50 and 20 mAs) with a Philips Brilliance 64 CT scanner. Precision of detecting bone and marker position at 50 mAs was not significantly different from 75 mAs and from the clinically used 150 mAs, but higher than 20 mAs. Furthermore, no differences of the precision in detecting bone orientation were found. These results indicate that the radiation dose can be reduced by a factor 3 compared to the clinically usual radiation dose, without affecting the precision of detecting bone pose and marker position in the foot and ankle.
ISSN:1350-4533
1873-4030
DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.05.004