Cost-effectiveness of the coronary sinus Reducer and its impact on the healthcare burden of refractory angina patients

Abstract Aims The coronary sinus Reducer is a percutaneous device proven to improve angina symptoms in refractory angina (RA). We evaluated its potential cost-effectiveness and impact on the healthcare resource use. Methods and results Angina-related healthcare resource usage and quality-of-life dat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes 2020-01, Vol.6 (1), p.32-40
Hauptverfasser: Gallone, Guglielmo, Armeni, Patrizio, Verheye, Stefan, Agostoni, Pierfrancesco, Timmers, Leo, Campo, Gianluca, Ielasi, Alfonso, Sgura, Fabio, Tarantini, Giuseppe, Rosseel, Liesbeth, Zivelonghi, Carlo, Leenders, Geert, Stella, Pieter, Tebaldi, Matteo, Tespili, Maurizio, D’Amico, Gianpiero, Baldetti, Luca, Ponticelli, Francesco, Colombo, Antonio, Giannini, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims The coronary sinus Reducer is a percutaneous device proven to improve angina symptoms in refractory angina (RA). We evaluated its potential cost-effectiveness and impact on the healthcare resource use. Methods and results Angina-related healthcare resource usage and quality-of-life data were collected for 215 consecutive RA patients undergoing Reducer implantation in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Italy. Costs were assessed from each country’s healthcare system perspective. Data from the date of RA diagnosis to Reducer implantation [Standard-of-Care (SoC)-period] and from Reducer implantation to follow-up (Reducer-period) were compared: during Reducer-period, a significant reduction in angina-driven hospitalizations, outpatient visits, coronary angiograms, and percutaneous coronary interventions per patient-year was observed, translating into significantly reduced costs per patient-year. To assess cost-effectiveness, costs and utilities of 1-year SoC were compared with those of 1-year Reducer-period. Assumptions on Reducer efficacy duration were further explored with modelled projections. Reducer was associated with higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs: 0.665 vs. 0.580, P 
ISSN:2058-5225
2058-1742
DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz027