Evaluating Mean Level and Within‐Person Consistency in Migraine Pain Intensity and Migraine‐Related Disability for AVP‐825 vs Oral Sumatriptan: Results from the COMPASS Study, A Randomized Trial

Background Consistency of response across multiple attacks is typically measured as the proportion of study participants who achieve a categorical endpoint over a specified number of attacks (ie, 2‐hour pain‐free response in 2 of 3 attacks). We applied a novel analytic approach for measuring consist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Headache 2019-07, Vol.59 (7), p.1002-1013
Hauptverfasser: McGinley, James S., Buse, Dawn C., Shulman, Kenneth J., Wirth, R. J., Hugentobler, Emmanuelle, Lipton, Richard B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Consistency of response across multiple attacks is typically measured as the proportion of study participants who achieve a categorical endpoint over a specified number of attacks (ie, 2‐hour pain‐free response in 2 of 3 attacks). We applied a novel analytic approach for measuring consistency of response in the acute treatment of episodic migraine using data from the COMPASS study. Methods The COMPASS study (NCT01667679) was a multiple attack crossover study which compared AVP‐825, a Breath Powered® intranasal delivery system for low‐dose sumatriptan powder (22 mg), with 100‐mg oral sumatriptan tablets in the acute treatment of migraine. Participants were 18–65 years old, met ICHD‐2 criteria for migraine with or without aura, and had migraine for ≥1 year prior to screening. They were instructed to treat up to 5 migraine attacks with each treatment and recorded migraine pain intensity and disability data at pre‐dose and 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes post‐dose for each attack. We explored the mean level and within‐person variability (WPV; a measure of consistency) in migraine pain intensity and migraine‐related disability across multiple attacks after treatment with AVP‐825 (22 mg) vs oral sumatriptan (100 mg) using location scale mixed‐effects models (LSMEMs). LSMEMs controlled for pre‐dose pain/disability, demographics, treatment sequence, and treatment period. Results The mean age was 40 and the sample was 84.6% women. Participants (N = 259) treated an average of 6.8 attacks each during the course of the study. Attacks treated with AVP‐825 showed significantly lower mean pain intensity and mean disability from 10 to 90 minutes post‐dose (effect sizes ranged from −0.09 to −0.29 and P values ranged from P < .0001 to P = .01). WPV was significantly greater at 10–15 minutes (WPV ratios ranged from 1.20 to 1.58 and P values ranged from P < .0001 to P = .04) but significantly reduced from 45 to 120 minutes for attacks treated with AVP‐825 compared to oral sumatriptan (WPV ratios ranged from 0.67 to 0.81 and P values ranged from P < .0001 to P = .03). Conclusions LSMEMs demonstrate that treatment with AVP‐825 is associated with lower average migraine pain intensity and disability from 10 to 90 minutes and greater within‐person consistency across multiple migraine attacks (reduced WPV) from 45 to 120 minutes post‐dose compared to oral sumatriptan. These findings may reflect the more rapid and consistent absorption of sumatriptan using AVP‐825
ISSN:0017-8748
1526-4610
DOI:10.1111/head.13530