Reliability and practical clinical application of an accelerometer-based dual-task gait balance control assessment
•IMU-based assessment has high consistency in multiple environments and days.•Analysis of peak accelerations may be a reliable measure of gait balance control.•Peak accelerations from a single IMU can detect differences in gait balance control.•The assessment can be practically applied in a D1 sport...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gait & posture 2019-06, Vol.71, p.279-283 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •IMU-based assessment has high consistency in multiple environments and days.•Analysis of peak accelerations may be a reliable measure of gait balance control.•Peak accelerations from a single IMU can detect differences in gait balance control.•The assessment can be practically applied in a D1 sports medicine clinic.
Gait balance control assessment using whole body center of mass (COM) kinematic measures in concussed individuals reveals persistent balance deficits up to two months post-injury. A reliable and clinically practical gait balance control assessment leveraging similar kinematic measures is necessary to improve concussion assessment and management.
Can peak accelerations collected during a dual-task (DT) gait assessment from a single low back placed accelerometer be measured reliably on different days, by different raters, in different environments, and be practically applied in a Division One (D1) athletics program?
A single accelerometer placed on the low back over the L5 vertebra was utilized with a DT gait analysis protocol. Twenty (10 F) healthy participants performed the assessment in a laboratory and non-laboratory environment, on two separate days, and with two different raters. Eight gait event specific peak accelerations along three orthogonal axes were collected. In addition, data were collected from a cohort of 14 D1 female soccer players during a single assessment to explore the practical clinical application.
Cronbach’s α values for the eight metrics ranged from 0.881 to 0.980 and ICC values from 0.868 to 0.987. Average assessment time for the 14 D1 female athletes was 8.50 ± 0.58 min, and significant differences between walking conditions were identified for Vert Accel 1 (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0966-6362 1879-2219 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.014 |