A multi‐centre randomized controlled trial of open vs closed management of the rectal defect after transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Aim Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a technically challenging strategy that allows expanded indications for local excision of rectal lesions. Transluminal suturing is difficult, so open management of the resultant defect is appealing. Expert opinion suggests there is more pain when the de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Colorectal disease 2019-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1025-1031
Hauptverfasser: Brown, C. J., Hochman, D., Raval, M. J., Moloo, H., Phang, P. T., Bouchard, A., Williams, L., Drolet, S., Boushey, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a technically challenging strategy that allows expanded indications for local excision of rectal lesions. Transluminal suturing is difficult, so open management of the resultant defect is appealing. Expert opinion suggests there is more pain when the defect is left open. The aim of this study was to determine if closure of the defect created during full thickness excision of rectal lesions with TEM leads to less postoperative pain compared to leaving the defect open. Method At the time of surgery, patients undergoing a full thickness TEM were randomized to sutured (TEM‐S) or open (TEM‐O) management of the rectal defect. At five Canadian academic colorectal surgery centres, experienced TEM surgeons enrolled patients ≥ 18 years treated by full thickness TEM. The primary outcome was postoperative pain measured by the visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain medication use and 30‐day postoperative complications, including bleeding, infection and hospital readmission. Results Between March 2012 and October 2013, 50 patients were enrolled and randomized to sutured (TEM‐S, n = 28) or open (TEM‐O, n = 22) management of the rectal defect. There was no difference between the two study groups in postoperative pain on postoperative day 1 (2.8 vs 2.6, P = 0.76), day 3 (2.8 vs 2.1, P = 0.23) and day 7 (2.8 vs 1.7, P = 0.10). Conclusion In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, there was no difference in postoperative pain between sutured or open defect management in patients having a full thickness excision with TEM.
ISSN:1462-8910
1463-1318
DOI:10.1111/codi.14689