Ultra-high-speed videography of resin–dentin interface failure dynamics under tensile load

Ultra-high-speed (UHS) videography was used to visualize the fracture phenomena at the resin–dentin interface during micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) test. We also investigated whether UHS videography is applicable for failure-mode analysis. Ten human mid-coronal dentin surfaces were bonded using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dental materials 2019-07, Vol.35 (7), p.e153-e161
Hauptverfasser: Hosaka, Keiichi, Tichy, Antonin, Ikeda, Masaomi, Nakagawa, Keiichi, Sadr, Alireza, Tagami, Junji, Takahashi, Masahiro, Sato, Kento, Nishitani, Yoshihiro, Klein-Junior, Celso Afonso, Pashley, David H., Nakajima, Masatoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ultra-high-speed (UHS) videography was used to visualize the fracture phenomena at the resin–dentin interface during micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) test. We also investigated whether UHS videography is applicable for failure-mode analysis. Ten human mid-coronal dentin surfaces were bonded using Clearfil SE Bond either in self-etching (SE) or etch-and-rinse (ER) mode. After 24-h water storage, the samples were cut into beams for μTBS test and tested at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. The fracture phenomena at the bonded interface were captured using a complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor digital UHS camera at 299,166 frames per second. The failure modes were classified using UHS videography, followed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The failure-mode distributions determined by UHS videography and SEM analysis were statistically analyzed using Fisher’s exact test with Bonferroni correction. The crack-propagation speed exceeded 1,500 km/h. No significant difference was found between the SEM and UHS videography failure-mode distributions in the SE mode. A significant difference appeared between them in the ER mode. Significant differences in the incidence of cohesive failures within the adhesive and at the adhesive–composite interface between the SE and ER modes were identified by both SEM and UHS videography. UHS videography enabled visualization of the fracture dynamics at the resin– dentin interfaces under tensile load. However, the resolution at such high frame rate was insufficient to classify the failure mode as precisely as that of SEM. Nevertheless, UHS videography can provide more detailed information about the fracture origin and propagation. •Resin–dentin interface fracture during μTBS test was visualized by UHS videography.•The speed of crack propagation exceeded 1,500 km/h.•Failure-mode distributions determined by UHS imaging were not as accurate as those of SEM.•The resolution of images at extremely high frame rates was insufficient.•A significant difference between SE and ER modes appeared in μTBS and failure mode.
ISSN:0109-5641
1879-0097
DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.006