Manager Perspectives on Implementation of a Farmers’ Market Incentive Program in Maryland

AbstractObjectiveA growing number of farmers’ markets offer incentive programs to increase access to fresh produce in low-income communities and support local farmers, yet program implementation has not been widely studied. This qualitative study explored market manager perspectives on implementing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nutrition education and behavior 2019-09, Vol.51 (8), p.926-935
Hauptverfasser: Hecht, Amelie A., BA, Misiaszek, Caitlin, MPH, Headrick, Gabby, MSPH, RD, LDN, Brosius, Shelley, MPH, Crone, Amy, MA, Surkan, Pamela J., ScD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AbstractObjectiveA growing number of farmers’ markets offer incentive programs to increase access to fresh produce in low-income communities and support local farmers, yet program implementation has not been widely studied. This qualitative study explored market manager perspectives on implementing a Maryland statewide farmers’ market incentive program. DesignSemistructured interviews with market managers. SettingParticipating farmers’ markets across Maryland. ParticipantsManagers of participating farmers’ markets (n = 19). Phenomenon of InterestBarriers and facilitators to program implementation and recommendations for improvement. AnalysisInterviews were analyzed using a phronetic iterative approach and themes were organized using an adapted version of a multilevel implementation framework. ResultsManagers reported overall favorable attitudes toward the incentive program. They identified barriers to implementation such as vendor buy-in and funding uncertainties, facilitators such as private fund-raising and local champions, and opportunities for improvement such as strengthening promotion and increasing the use of technology to reduce the data collection burden. Conclusions and ImplicationsManagers identified implementation barriers (eg, customer confusion) and facilitators (eg, ease of staff training) that may be shared by other incentive programs. Based on these findings, barriers and recommendations may be addressed through collaborative problem-solving with managers, vendors, and customers, and facilitators can be amplified broadly. Future research is warranted to explore incentive program implementation in other settings.
ISSN:1499-4046
1878-2620
DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2019.04.001