Current Status of Bone-Forming Therapies for the Management of Osteoporosis

In patients with osteoporosis and severely reduced bone mass and/or recurring fractures, antiresorptive therapy may not be the optimal first-line treatment. Two recent clinical trials comparing bone-forming treatment with antiresorptive therapy have demonstrated that bone-forming treatment is superi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drugs & aging 2019-07, Vol.36 (7), p.625-638
Hauptverfasser: Sølling, Anne Sophie Koldkjær, Harsløf, Torben, Langdahl, Bente
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In patients with osteoporosis and severely reduced bone mass and/or recurring fractures, antiresorptive therapy may not be the optimal first-line treatment. Two recent clinical trials comparing bone-forming treatment with antiresorptive therapy have demonstrated that bone-forming treatment is superior in reducing the fracture risk in patients with severe osteoporosis. All of the currently available bone-forming agents—teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab—increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the fracture risk; however, the effect wears off with time and treatment is therefore only transient. Thus, a bone-forming therapy should be followed by antiresorptive treatment with a bisphosphonate or denosumab. The BMD response to bone-forming treatment is reduced in patients previously treated with antiresorptive drugs; however, based on the findings of the VERO trial, the anti-fracture efficacy of bone-forming treatment in comparison with antiresorptives seems to be preserved. This review provides an overview of the existing bone-forming therapies for osteoporosis including considerations of sequential and combination therapy.
ISSN:1170-229X
1179-1969
DOI:10.1007/s40266-019-00675-8