Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Ischemic Heart Disease by PET/MRI: Comparison of Left Ventricular Perfusion, Hibernation, and Scar Burden

Hybrid positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET-MR) is a novel imaging technology that enables a comprehensive assessment of myocardial viability. The aim of this study was to intra-individually compare simultaneously acquired viability parameters from MRI and PET to determine complement...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic radiology 2020-02, Vol.27 (2), p.188-197
Hauptverfasser: Beitzke, Dietrich, Rasul, Sazan, Lassen, Martin Lyngby, Pichler, Verena, Senn, Daniela, Stelzmüller, Marie Elisabeth, Nolz, Richard, Loewe, Christian, Hacker, Marcus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hybrid positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET-MR) is a novel imaging technology that enables a comprehensive assessment of myocardial viability. The aim of this study was to intra-individually compare simultaneously acquired viability parameters from MRI and PET to determine complementary and redundant information. Thirty-nine patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) underwent cardiac PET-MR for myocardial viability assessment. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and PET, including a dynamic dual-tracer acquisition of [13N]ammonia ([13N]NH3)/[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG), were performed simultaneously. Allocation, extent, and transmural degree of left ventricular (LV) scars were measured from LGE. Perfusion, viability, and hibernation were assessed by PET. A comparison of scar location revealed six more areas of infarction on MR than on PET. Mean LV scarring by CMR was 14% (range, 2% to 42%) and 14% (range, 1% to 46%) by PET (CMR vs. PET: p = 0.9). An intra-individual comparison of scarring showed a good inter-method correlation (r = 0.7), which was also evident in the subgroup with low ejection fraction (EF) (r = 0.6). Hibernation and transmural degree of scars showed a moderate to weak correlation (r = 0.4), which was even worse in the low EF group (r = 0.1). In patients with IHD, there was a good correlation between PET and CMR for the LV scar extent using hybrid cardiac PET-MR. The degree of transmural scarring by CMR showed no correlation to PET hibernation. Therefore, cardiac PET-MR might be a suitable tool for a comprehensive assessment of myocardial viability if used to predict response to cardiac reperfusion strategies.
ISSN:1076-6332
1878-4046
DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.021