Image quantification technology of the heterochromatin and euchromatin region for differential diagnosis in the lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia

Background Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) was first described by Nucci et al. in 1999 and is believed to be a precancerous lesion of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma and gastric‐type adenocarcinoma in the uterine cervix. LEGH lesions do not always exhibit apparent cellular and str...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic cytopathology 2019-06, Vol.47 (6), p.553-563
Hauptverfasser: Kimura, Fumikazu, Kobayashi, Takaki, Kanai, Ryo, Kobayashi, Yukihiro, Yuhi, Ohtani, Ota, Hiroyoshi, Yamaguchi, Masahiro, Yokokawa, Yoshiharu, Uehara, Takeshi, Ishii, Keiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) was first described by Nucci et al. in 1999 and is believed to be a precancerous lesion of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma and gastric‐type adenocarcinoma in the uterine cervix. LEGH lesions do not always exhibit apparent cellular and structural atypia, so are difficult to distinguish from normal endocervical cells (EC cells) with cytological examination. Therefore, we often struggle to make a definite diagnosis of LEGH. Methods We used microscopy images of cytological specimens that were diagnosed as EC cells and LEGH cells. Signal intensity in whole nuclear area and in heterochromatin and euchromatin regions, euchromatin area ratio, and nuclear morphological features were quantified in each cell nucleus of the cases. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine statistical significance. Finally, we performed linear support vector machine (LSVM) modeling as a discriminant analysis using the quantified features. Results Signal intensity in whole nuclear area, and heterochromatin and euchromatin regions of EC cell nuclei were higher than that of the LEGH cell nuclei. Morphologically, EC cell nuclei were larger than LEGH cell nuclei, and nuclei of LEGH cells had irregular nuclear respectively membrane structure and an elongated shape. The LSVM accuracy of 10‐fold cross validation and leave‐one‐case‐out cross‐validation (LOCOCV) using all measured features were 84.7% to 89.3% and 78.6% to 86.0%, respectively. Conclusions The LVSM analysis using features extracted from signal intensity and morphological analysis was useful for discrimination of EC cells vs LEGH cells. We therefore believe that this image analysis method could be used for early detection of LEGH.
ISSN:8755-1039
1097-0339
DOI:10.1002/dc.24155