Flow cytometric predictive scoring systems for common fusions ETV6/RUNX1, BCR/ABL1, TCF3/PBX1 and rearrangements of the KMT2A gene, proposed for the initial cytogenetic approach in cases of B‐acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Introduction In B‐acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL), the identification of cytogenetic prognostic factors is important for stratifying patients into risk groups and tailoring treatment accordingly. The purpose of this study was to propose flow cytometric (FCM) scoring systems (SSs) for predicting...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of laboratory hematology 2019-06, Vol.41 (3), p.364-372
Hauptverfasser: Tsagarakis, Nikolaos J., Papadhimitriou, Stefanos I., Pavlidis, Dimitris, Marinakis, Theodoros, Kostopoulos, Ioannis V., Stiakaki, Eftichia, Polychronopoulou, Sofia, Paterakis, George
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction In B‐acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL), the identification of cytogenetic prognostic factors is important for stratifying patients into risk groups and tailoring treatment accordingly. The purpose of this study was to propose flow cytometric (FCM) scoring systems (SSs) for predicting t(12;21)(p13;q22), t(9;22)(q34;q11), t(11q23), and t(1;19)(q23;p13.3) translocations. Methods We analyzed retrospectively the FCM immunophenotype of 377 patients with B‐ALL with regard to the major cytogenetic findings revealed by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (i‐FISH). Comparing descriptive data on the expression of each antigen and performing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, we identified the most reliable predictive markers for each translocation and sought to establish a specific SS for each translocation, based on specific antibody panels. Results CD27, CD9, CD66c, CD10, CD25, and CD34 were employed for the prediction of t(12;21), CD25, CD38, CD34, and CD66c for t(9;22), NG2, CD10, CD15, CD34, and CD20 for t(11q23), and CD34, cμ, CD123, and CD66c for t(1;19). The sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of each predictive score were 89.29% and 96.15% for t(12;21), 75.00% and 88.19% for t(9;22), 84.21% and 99.04% for t(11q23), and 85.71% and 92.71% for t(1;19). Conclusion Four highly specific and significantly sensitive FCM‐obtained SSs are proposed for the prediction of the four major translocations observed in patients with B‐ALL. Prospective evaluation of the proposed SSs could lead to a better targeted cytogenetic investigation and therefore to more cost‐effective laboratory practice.
ISSN:1751-5521
1751-553X
DOI:10.1111/ijlh.12983