The predictive value of the preoperative C-reactive protein–albumin ratio for early recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: using randomized phase III trial data

Background The definition and predictors of early recurrence (ER) for gastric cancer (GC) patients after radical gastrectomy are unclear. Methods A minimum- p value approach was used to evaluate the optimal cutoff value of recurrence-free survival to determine ER and late recurrence (LR). Receiver o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2019-09, Vol.22 (5), p.1016-1028
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Bin-bin, Lu, Jun, Zheng, Zhi-fang, Xie, Jian-wei, Wang, Jia-bin, Lin, Jian-xian, Chen, Qi-yue, Cao, Long-long, Lin, Mi, Tu, Ru-hong, Huang, Ze-ning, Lin, Ju-li, Zheng, Chao-hui, Huang, Chang-ming, Li, Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The definition and predictors of early recurrence (ER) for gastric cancer (GC) patients after radical gastrectomy are unclear. Methods A minimum- p value approach was used to evaluate the optimal cutoff value of recurrence-free survival to determine ER and late recurrence (LR). Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for inflammatory indices. Potential risk factors for ER were assessed with a Cox regression model. A decision curve analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical utility. Results A total of 401 patients recruited in a clinical trial (NCT02327481) from January 2015 to April 2016 were included in this study. The optimal length of recurrence-free survival to distinguish between ER ( n  = 44) and LR ( n  = 52) was 12 months. Factors associated with ER included a preoperative C-reactive protein–albumin ratio (CAR) ≥ 0.131, stage III and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC) > 3 cycles. The risk model consisting of both the CAR and TNM stage had a higher predictive ability and better clinical utility than TNM stage alone. Further stratification analysis of the stage III patients found that for the patients with a CAR  3 cycles ( p   3 cycles (54.2% vs 16.0%, p  = 0.004), rather than 1–3 cycles (58.3% vs 54.2%, p  = 0.824). Conclusions A recurrence-free interval of 12 months was found to be the optimal threshold for differentiating between ER and LR. Preoperative CAR was a promising predictor of ER and PAC response. PAC with 1–3 cycles may not exert a protective effect against ER for stage III GC patients with CAR ≥ 0.131.
ISSN:1436-3291
1436-3305
DOI:10.1007/s10120-019-00936-w