Genitourinary Complications of Gender-Affirming Surgery

Purpose of Review Gender-affirming surgery has become a more common procedure in the last 5 years. Feminizing genitoplasty typically involves inversion of penile skin as a neovagina, urethral shortening, and glans reduction to create a neoclitoris. Masculinizing genitoplasty is more complex, typical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current urology reports 2019-06, Vol.20 (6), p.31-31, Article 31
Hauptverfasser: Bryson, Campbell, Honig, Stanton C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose of Review Gender-affirming surgery has become a more common procedure in the last 5 years. Feminizing genitoplasty typically involves inversion of penile skin as a neovagina, urethral shortening, and glans reduction to create a neoclitoris. Masculinizing genitoplasty is more complex, typically is performed in multiple stages, and has more inherent urologic risks. Recent Findings The most common urologic complications involve voiding dysfunction, specifically meatal stenosis or fistula to the urinary tract. Urethral stricture, fistula, urinary retention, and voiding dysfunction are very common and require early recognition and intervention. This includes placement of catheter drainage, if necessary with the appropriate urologic instrumentation. Genital risks relating to phallus health are rare, but risks associated with placement of penile prosthesis for sexual function are common and require immediate attention. Summary Urological complications after gender-affirming surgery are common, and the general urologist and urogynecologist should be able to identify and treat problems in this population after review of this chapter.
ISSN:1527-2737
1534-6285
DOI:10.1007/s11934-019-0894-4