The nature of visual awareness at stimulus energy and feature levels: A backward masking study
The level of processing (LoP) hypothesis proposes that low-level stimulus perception (i.e., stimulus energy and features) is a graded process whereas high-level (i.e., letters, words, meaning) stimulus perception is all-or-none. In the present study, we set up a visual masking design in order to exa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2019-08, Vol.81 (6), p.1926-1943 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The
level of processing
(LoP) hypothesis proposes that low-level stimulus perception (i.e., stimulus energy and features) is a graded process whereas high-level (i.e., letters, words, meaning) stimulus perception is all-or-none. In the present study, we set up a visual masking design in order to examine the nature of visual awareness at stimulus
energy
(i.e., detection task) and
feature levels
(identification task) at specific individual target durations (13, 27, 40, 53, and 80 ms). We manipulated the strength of the masking to produce different visibility conditions and gathered participants’ subjective (across a 4-point awareness scale) and objective (accuracy levels) awareness performances. We found that
intermediate ratings
(i.e., ratings 2 and 3, which index graded awareness experiences) were used in more than 50% of the trials for target presentations of 27, 40, 53, and 80 ms. In addition, objective accuracy performances for target presentations of 27 and 80 ms produced linearly increasing detection and identification accuracies across the awareness scale categories, respectively. Overall, our results suggest that visual awareness at
energy
and
feature levels
of stimulus perception may be graded. Furthermore, we found a divergence in detection and identification performance results, which emphasizes the need for an adequate election of target durations when studying different perceptual processes such as detection versus more complex stimulus identification processes. Finally, “clarity” in the perceptual awareness scale should be exhaustively defined depending on the
level of processing
of the stimulus, as participants may recalibrate the meaning of the different awareness categories depending on task demands. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1943-3921 1943-393X |
DOI: | 10.3758/s13414-019-01732-5 |