The nature of visual awareness at stimulus energy and feature levels: A backward masking study

The level of processing (LoP) hypothesis proposes that low-level stimulus perception (i.e., stimulus energy and features) is a graded process whereas high-level (i.e., letters, words, meaning) stimulus perception is all-or-none. In the present study, we set up a visual masking design in order to exa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2019-08, Vol.81 (6), p.1926-1943
Hauptverfasser: Jimenez, Mikel, Villalba-García, Cristina, Luna, Dolores, Hinojosa, José Antonio, Montoro, Pedro R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The level of processing (LoP) hypothesis proposes that low-level stimulus perception (i.e., stimulus energy and features) is a graded process whereas high-level (i.e., letters, words, meaning) stimulus perception is all-or-none. In the present study, we set up a visual masking design in order to examine the nature of visual awareness at stimulus energy (i.e., detection task) and feature levels (identification task) at specific individual target durations (13, 27, 40, 53, and 80 ms). We manipulated the strength of the masking to produce different visibility conditions and gathered participants’ subjective (across a 4-point awareness scale) and objective (accuracy levels) awareness performances. We found that intermediate ratings (i.e., ratings 2 and 3, which index graded awareness experiences) were used in more than 50% of the trials for target presentations of 27, 40, 53, and 80 ms. In addition, objective accuracy performances for target presentations of 27 and 80 ms produced linearly increasing detection and identification accuracies across the awareness scale categories, respectively. Overall, our results suggest that visual awareness at energy and feature levels of stimulus perception may be graded. Furthermore, we found a divergence in detection and identification performance results, which emphasizes the need for an adequate election of target durations when studying different perceptual processes such as detection versus more complex stimulus identification processes. Finally, “clarity” in the perceptual awareness scale should be exhaustively defined depending on the level of processing of the stimulus, as participants may recalibrate the meaning of the different awareness categories depending on task demands.
ISSN:1943-3921
1943-393X
DOI:10.3758/s13414-019-01732-5