Comparison of the immunogenicity of Dukoral® oral cholera vaccine between renal transplant recipients on either a calcineurin inhibitor or mycophenolate – A controlled trial
•Seroconversion after Dukoral 57% in renal transplant recipients and 81% in controls.•Vaccine response most suppressed by mycophenolate followed by calcineurin inhibitor.•Do not discard oral vaccines in immunosuppressed patients. The evidence for recommendations regarding vaccination in solid organ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2019-05, Vol.37 (23), p.3133-3139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Seroconversion after Dukoral 57% in renal transplant recipients and 81% in controls.•Vaccine response most suppressed by mycophenolate followed by calcineurin inhibitor.•Do not discard oral vaccines in immunosuppressed patients.
The evidence for recommendations regarding vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients is sparse. There is little data comparing vaccine responses between groups on different immunosuppressive drugs. This study was conducted to evaluate the antibody response to Dukoral® oral cholera vaccine in renal transplant recipients (RTR).
In a single-center non-randomized controlled clinical trial, healthy volunteers (n = 21) and renal transplant recipients (n = 30) were vaccinated with the oral whole cell/recombinant B subunit cholera vaccine Dukoral® (Valneva Inc., Vienna, Austria). The RTR were stratified according to their maintenance immunosuppressive therapy: either prednisone and a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus; P/CNI group; n = 15) or prednisone and mycophenolate (P/MMF group; n = 15). All volunteers ingested Dukoral® at baseline and at day 14. Serum samples were drawn at day 0 and day 21. The primary outcome was seroconversion, defined as either a 3-fold IgA serum titer increase in anti-cholera toxin B antibodies and/or a 4-fold rise in the serum vibriocidal titer.
Follow-up was complete. Seroconversion after vaccination was 57% (standard error, SE 9%) in RTR and 81% (SE 9%) in healthy controls (Relative Risk, RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.48–1.02). When stratified according to maintenance immunosuppression, the seroconversion rate was 67% (SE 12%) in the P/CNI group (RR compared with controls 0.82; 95% CI 0.55–1.25) and 47% (SE 13%) in the P/MMF group (RR compared with controls 0.58; 95% CI 0.32–1.03).
Adverse events were mild to moderate and transient. The response to Dukoral was weaker and the seroconversion rate was lower in renal transplant recipients than in healthy controls. In particular, those using mycophenolate had a poor response. Nevertheless, more than half of the transplant recipients seroconverted. Therefore oral vaccines should not be discarded as a potential tool for protection of solid organ transplant recipients.
This trial is registered in clinicaltrials.gov under NCT01109914. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.010 |