Effects of 20-degree spinal immobilization on respiratory functions in otherwise healthy volunteers with android-type obesity

The aim of the study was to assess whether spinal immobilization with long back board (LBB) and semi-rigid cervical collar (CC) at 20° instead of 0° conserves pulmonary functions in obese volunteers, including forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of emergency medicine 2020-01, Vol.38 (1), p.60-64
Hauptverfasser: Işık, Gülşah Çıkrıkçı, Demirci, Osman Lütfi, Çorbacıoğlu, Şeref Kerem, Çevik, Yunsur
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of the study was to assess whether spinal immobilization with long back board (LBB) and semi-rigid cervical collar (CC) at 20° instead of 0° conserves pulmonary functions in obese volunteers, including forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio. The study included adult volunteer subjects with android-type obesity who were otherwise healthy. First, pulmonary functions were tested in a seated position to obtain baseline levels, than volunteers were immobilized with LBB and CC at 0-degree and measurements repeated at 0th and 30th minute of immobilization. Next day, same procedures were repeated with the trauma board at 20-degree. Changes over time in FEV1, FVC values and FEV1/FVC ratios during spinal immobilization at 0° and 20° were compared to baseline levels. Study included 30 volunteers. Results showed a significant decline in all values for both situations following spinal immobilization (p  .05). The present findings confirm that spinal immobilization reduces pulmonary functions in obese volunteers, and that 20-degree immobilization has no conservative effect on these values when compared to the traditional 0-degree immobilization. It may be that 20° is insufficient to decrease the negative effect of abdominal obesity on pulmonary functions.
ISSN:0735-6757
1532-8171
DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.04.022