Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl
To the Editor: In their two articles, Bhatt et al. 1 and Manson et al. 2 (Jan. 3 issue) report opposing results for n−3 fatty acids with respect to cardiovascular risk benefits. However, there is a difference by a factor of 4.75 in the daily doses of n−3 fatty acids that were administered in the two...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2019-04, Vol.380 (17), p.1677-1678 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
In their two articles, Bhatt et al.
1
and Manson et al.
2
(Jan. 3 issue) report opposing results for n−3 fatty acids with respect to cardiovascular risk benefits. However, there is a difference by a factor of 4.75 in the daily doses of n−3 fatty acids that were administered in the two trials: 840 mg versus 3992 mg. These findings are consistent with the results of the Alpha Omega Trial,
3
in which low-dose n−3 fatty acids were ineffective in reducing cardiovascular events.
3
The dose-dependent increases in plasma and tissue levels of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMc1902165 |