Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl

To the Editor: In their two articles, Bhatt et al. 1 and Manson et al. 2 (Jan. 3 issue) report opposing results for n−3 fatty acids with respect to cardiovascular risk benefits. However, there is a difference by a factor of 4.75 in the daily doses of n−3 fatty acids that were administered in the two...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2019-04, Vol.380 (17), p.1677-1678
Hauptverfasser: Chan, Lingtak-Neander, Borghi, Claudio, Fogacci, Federica, Cicero, Arrigo F.G, Bhatt, Deepak L, Steg, P. Gabriel, Miller, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: In their two articles, Bhatt et al. 1 and Manson et al. 2 (Jan. 3 issue) report opposing results for n−3 fatty acids with respect to cardiovascular risk benefits. However, there is a difference by a factor of 4.75 in the daily doses of n−3 fatty acids that were administered in the two trials: 840 mg versus 3992 mg. These findings are consistent with the results of the Alpha Omega Trial, 3 in which low-dose n−3 fatty acids were ineffective in reducing cardiovascular events. 3 The dose-dependent increases in plasma and tissue levels of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMc1902165