Scanning transmission electron microscopy under controlled low-pressure atmospheres
•A leakvalve attached to a Nion UltraSTEM 100 in Vienna allows atomic-resolution imaging under controlled atmospheres.•The available pressure range is 10−10–10−6 mbar.•We mimic a “standard” TEM instrument (pressure ca. 10−6 mbar) to study the effect of air on graphene and its contamination.•Residual...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ultramicroscopy 2019-08, Vol.203, p.76-81 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •A leakvalve attached to a Nion UltraSTEM 100 in Vienna allows atomic-resolution imaging under controlled atmospheres.•The available pressure range is 10−10–10−6 mbar.•We mimic a “standard” TEM instrument (pressure ca. 10−6 mbar) to study the effect of air on graphene and its contamination.•Residual gases lead etching of contamination and defecteive graphene. The effect is most pronounced with O2.•This shows that oxygen by itself is enough to cause electron-beam-induced etching without the need of water molecules.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is carried out in vacuum to minimize the interaction of the imaging electrons with gas molecules while passing through the microscope column. Nevertheless, in typical devices, the pressure remains at 10−7 mbar or above, providing a large number of gas molecules for the electron beam to crack, which can lead to structural changes in the sample. Here, we describe experiments carried out in a modified scanning TEM (STEM) instrument, based on the Nion UltraSTEM 100. In this instrument, the base pressure at the sample is around 2×10−10 mbar, and can be varied up to 10−6 mbar through introduction of gases directly into the objective area while maintaining atomic resolution imaging conditions. We show that air leaked into the microscope column during the experiment is efficient in cleaning graphene samples from contamination, but ineffective in damaging the pristine lattice. Our experiments also show that exposure to O2 and H2O lead to a similar result, oxygen providing an etching effect nearly twice as efficient as water, presumably due to the two O atoms per molecule. H2 and N2 environments have no influence on etching. These results show that the residual gas environment in typical TEM instruments can have a large influence on the observations, and show that chemical etching of carbon-based structures can be effectively carried out with oxygen. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-3991 1879-2723 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.02.002 |