David Tovey replies to Melanie Newman and The BMJ
dtovey@cochrane.org Newman asks whether Cochrane has “lost its way” given recent ructions arising from the governing board’s decision to remove membership status from Peter Gøtzsche.1 On the contrary, by all objective measures, Cochrane is thriving. Underlying this success are the international auth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ (Online) 2019-02, Vol.364, p.l664-l664 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | dtovey@cochrane.org Newman asks whether Cochrane has “lost its way” given recent ructions arising from the governing board’s decision to remove membership status from Peter Gøtzsche.1 On the contrary, by all objective measures, Cochrane is thriving. Underlying this success are the international author teams and 52 Cochrane review groups, yet they barely rate a mention in Newman’s article, and only one coordinating (lead) editor is quoted. Rather than credit these positive contributions, critics focus on the necessary, overdue introduction of 21st century measures relating to good governance and accountability. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-8138 1756-1833 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.l664 |