Development and validation of the Health Visual Information Preference Scale

Objective Patients are likely to have individual preferences for learning about health, which may influence their comprehension and utilization of health information. Some patients may prefer visual health information, which can make complex health information easier to understand. Aligning health i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of health psychology 2019-09, Vol.24 (3), p.593-609
Hauptverfasser: Jones, Annie S. K., Kleinstäuber, Maria, Martin, Leslie R., Norton, Sam, Fernandez, Justin, Petrie, Keith J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Patients are likely to have individual preferences for learning about health, which may influence their comprehension and utilization of health information. Some patients may prefer visual health information, which can make complex health information easier to understand. Aligning health information presentation with preferences may increase understanding and improve health outcomes, yet no scale measures preferences for visual health information. Design Two studies examined the psychometric properties of the Health Visual Information Preference Scale (Health VIPS), a new measure designed to assess preferences for visual health information. Methods In Study 1, 103 undergraduate students and 97 patients undergoing colorectal and gynaecological oncology surgery completed the Health VIPS. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were conducted for both samples. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and validity were assessed in the student sample. In Study 2, 196 outpatients completed the Health VIPS. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on this sample, in addition to measures of reliability and validity. Results In Study 1, EFA analysis suggested a two‐factor structure. The Health VIPS demonstrated good internal consistency in both the student sample (α = .70–.80) and patient sample (α = .80), and good test–retest reliability in the student sample (r = .63, p 
ISSN:1359-107X
2044-8287
DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12370