The effect of parathyroidectomy on patients' symptoms in tertiary hyperparathyroidism

Background The efficacy of parathyroidectomy for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism is well‐established but evidence in tertiary hyperparathyroidism is lacking. We examined parathyroidectomy's effect in tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Methods Patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism who...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Head & neck 2019-08, Vol.41 (8), p.2748-2755
Hauptverfasser: See, Anna, Lim, Amy E. L., Wong, Jiunn, Choong, Hui Lin, Iyer, N Gopalakrishna, Tan, Hiang Khoon, Tan, Ngian Chye, Ng, Jeremy C. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The efficacy of parathyroidectomy for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism is well‐established but evidence in tertiary hyperparathyroidism is lacking. We examined parathyroidectomy's effect in tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Methods Patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy were followed up for 12 months. A modification of the 13‐item parathyroid symptoms list developed by Pasieka was administered at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post‐surgery. We also examined if preoperative factors would predict symptom improvement post‐surgery. Results Ninety‐one patients were included. Survey response rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post‐surgery were 97.8%, 90.1%, 82.4%, and 80.2%, respectively. Mean preoperative Pasieka parathyroid score (PSS) was 6.3 ± 2.7. At first month, PSS decreased to 2.9 ± 2.0 (P
ISSN:1043-3074
1097-0347
DOI:10.1002/hed.25750