The effect of parathyroidectomy on patients' symptoms in tertiary hyperparathyroidism
Background The efficacy of parathyroidectomy for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism is well‐established but evidence in tertiary hyperparathyroidism is lacking. We examined parathyroidectomy's effect in tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Methods Patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism who...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Head & neck 2019-08, Vol.41 (8), p.2748-2755 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The efficacy of parathyroidectomy for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism is well‐established but evidence in tertiary hyperparathyroidism is lacking. We examined parathyroidectomy's effect in tertiary hyperparathyroidism.
Methods
Patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy were followed up for 12 months. A modification of the 13‐item parathyroid symptoms list developed by Pasieka was administered at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post‐surgery. We also examined if preoperative factors would predict symptom improvement post‐surgery.
Results
Ninety‐one patients were included. Survey response rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post‐surgery were 97.8%, 90.1%, 82.4%, and 80.2%, respectively. Mean preoperative Pasieka parathyroid score (PSS) was 6.3 ± 2.7. At first month, PSS decreased to 2.9 ± 2.0 (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1043-3074 1097-0347 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hed.25750 |