Insular and anterior cingulate cortex deep stimulation for central neuropathic pain: Disassembling the percept of pain

OBJECTIVETo compare the analgesic effects of stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) or the posterior superior insula (PSI) against sham deep (d) repetitive (r) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with central neuropathic pain (CNP) after stroke or spinal cord injury in a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurology 2019-04, Vol.92 (18), p.e2165-e2175
Hauptverfasser: Galhardoni, Ricardo, Aparecida da Silva, Valquíria, García-Larrea, Luís, Dale, Camila, Baptista, Abrahão F, Barbosa, Luciana Mendonça, Menezes, Luciana Mendes Bahia, de Siqueira, Silvia R.D.T, Valério, Fernanda, Rosi, Jefferson, de Lima Rodrigues, Antonia Lilian, Reis Mendes Fernandes, Diego Toledo, Lorencini Selingardi, Priscila Mara, Marcolin, Marco Antônio, Duran, Fábio Luís de Souza, Ono, Carla Rachel, Lucato, Leandro Tavares, Fernandes, Ana Mércia B L, da Silva, Fábio E F, Yeng, Lin T, Brunoni, André R, Buchpiguel, Carlos A, Teixeira, Manoel J, Ciampi de Andrade, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVETo compare the analgesic effects of stimulation of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) or the posterior superior insula (PSI) against sham deep (d) repetitive (r) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with central neuropathic pain (CNP) after stroke or spinal cord injury in a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, 3-arm parallel study. METHODSParticipants were randomly allocated into the active PSI-rTMS, ACC-rTMS, sham-PSI-rTMS, or sham-ACC-rTMS arms. Stimulations were performed for 12 weeks, and a comprehensive clinical and pain assessment, psychophysics, and cortical excitability measurements were performed at baseline and during treatment. The main outcome of the study was pain intensity (numeric rating scale [NRS]) after the last stimulation session. RESULTSNinety-eight patients (age 55.02 ± 12.13 years) completed the study. NRS score was not significantly different between groups at the end of the study. Active rTMS treatments had no significant effects on pain interference with daily activities, pain dimensions, neuropathic pain symptoms, mood, medication use, cortical excitability measurements, or quality of life. Heat pain threshold was significantly increased after treatment in the PSI-dTMS group from baseline (1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09–3.06]) compared to sham-dTMS (−1.02, 95% CI −2.10 to 0.04, p = 0.014), and ACC-dTMS caused a significant decrease in anxiety scores (−2.96, 95% CI −4.1 to −1.7]) compared to sham-dTMS (−0.78, 95% CI −1.9 to 0.3; p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONSACC- and PSI-dTMS were not different from sham-dTMS for pain relief in CNP despite a significant antinociceptive effect after insular stimulation and anxiolytic effects of ACC-dTMS. These results showed that the different dimensions of pain can be modulated in humans noninvasively by directly stimulating deeper SNC cortical structures without necessarily affecting clinical pain per se. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER:NCT01932905.
ISSN:0028-3878
1526-632X
DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007396