Skip corpectomy and fusion (SCF) versus anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF): which is better for patients with multilevel cervical OPLL?

Background The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and radiological outcomes of skip corpectomy and fusion (SCF) with anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) for treating multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods 62 patients wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2019-11, Vol.139 (11), p.1533-1541
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Bin, Sun, Jingchuan, Xu, Ximing, Shi, Jiangang, Guo, Yongfei, Sun, Kaiqiang, Yang, Haisong, Wang, Yuan, Huan, Le, Sun, Xiaofei, Wang, Haibo, Zheng, Bing, Chen, Fangni, Zhang, Peng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and radiological outcomes of skip corpectomy and fusion (SCF) with anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) for treating multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods 62 patients with multilevel OPLL who had undergone SCF or ACAF were analyzed retrospectively. Types of OPLL, occupying ratio (OR), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Recovery Rate (RR), Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Cobb’s angles of C2–C7, operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, ratings for fusion assessment and complications were recorded and assessed. Results Postoperative C2–C7 Cobb’s angle (11.1 ± 3.2° vs. 13.7 ± 2.5°; P 
ISSN:0936-8051
1434-3916
DOI:10.1007/s00402-019-03182-y