Frailty and Greater Health Care Resource Utilization Following Major Urologic Oncology Surgery

In the setting of value-based care, it is critical to improve our understanding of surgical risk and greater health care resource utilization (HRU) as it relates to frailty. To evaluate the impact of frailty on HRU and surgical morbidity in urologic oncology surgery using the five-item frailty index...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology oncology 2019-02, Vol.2 (1), p.21-27
Hauptverfasser: Taylor, Benjamin L., Xia, Leilei, Guzzo, Thomas J., Scherr, Douglas S., Hu, Jim C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the setting of value-based care, it is critical to improve our understanding of surgical risk and greater health care resource utilization (HRU) as it relates to frailty. To evaluate the impact of frailty on HRU and surgical morbidity in urologic oncology surgery using the five-item frailty index. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using subjects from the 2012–2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent radical cystectomy or minimally invasive or open radical prostatectomy, radical nephrectomy, or partial nephrectomy. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the association between frailty index and any increase in HRU, which was defined as prolonged length of stay greater than the 75th percentile, discharge to continued care, or unplanned readmission within 30 d. In the overall cohort of 92 999 subjects and within each surgery type, increasing frailty score was associated with significant stepwise increases in HRU. Logistic regression adjusting for patient demographics revealed statistically significant odds ratios of 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–1.3; p
ISSN:2588-9311
2588-9311
DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2018.06.005