Pre-Dilatation Versus No Pre-Dilatation for Implantation of a Self-Expanding Valve in All Comers Undergoing TAVR: The DIRECT Trial

The aim of this study was to compare the implantation of a self-expanding valve with or without balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in an open-label, noninferiority, randomized trial. There are no randomized studies comparing the implantation of a self-expanding valve with (pre-BAV) or without BAV. C...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JACC. Cardiovascular interventions 2019-04, Vol.12 (8), p.767-777
Hauptverfasser: Toutouzas, Konstantinos, Benetos, Georgios, Voudris, Vasilis, Drakopoulou, Maria, Stathogiannis, Konstantinos, Latsios, George, Synetos, Andreas, Antonopoulos, Alexios, Kosmas, Elias, Iakovou, Ioannis, Katsimagklis, Georgios, Mastrokostopoulos, Antonios, Moraitis, Sotiris, Zeniou, Vicki, Danenberg, Haim, Vavuranakis, Manolis, Tousoulis, Dimitris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to compare the implantation of a self-expanding valve with or without balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in an open-label, noninferiority, randomized trial. There are no randomized studies comparing the implantation of a self-expanding valve with (pre-BAV) or without BAV. Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis were randomly assigned to undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the use of self-expanding prostheses with (pre-BAV) or without (no-BAV) pre-dilatation. The primary endpoint was device success according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria. Secondary endpoints included periprocedural mortality and stroke, new permanent pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, and 1-year mortality. The trial was scheduled to show noninferiority (Δ = 15%) of the direct versus the pre-BAV approach. A total of 171 patients were randomized at 4 centers. Of these, 86 underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with pre-dilatation and 85 without. Device success was noninferior in the no-BAV group compared with the pre-BAV group (65 of 85 [76.5%] for no-BAV vs. 64 of 86 [74.4%] for pre-BAV; mean difference 2.1%; 90% confidence interval: -8.9% to 13%). In the no-BAV group, 25 patients (29.4%) underwent post-balloon dilatation, and in the pre-BAV group, 13 patients (15.1%) underwent post-balloon dilatation (p = 0.03). Regarding major vascular complications and permanent pacemaker implantation, there was no difference between the 2 groups (log-rank p = 0.49, log-rank p = 0.54). In 1-month completed follow-up for all patients, there was 1 periprocedural stroke (0.5%), without any deaths. Direct, without balloon pre-dilatation, transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis system is noninferior to the pre-dilatation procedure. Lower post-dilatation rates were encountered in the group with pre-dilatation. (The Predilatation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial [DIRECT]; NCT02448927).
ISSN:1876-7605
DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.005