The association between platelet dysfunction and adverse outcomes in cardiac surgical patients

Summary Haemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with prothrombotic complications. Although it is not possible to detect and quantify haemostatic activation directly, platelet dysfunction, as measured with point‐of‐care‐assays, may be a useful surrogate. In this study, we a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia 2019-09, Vol.74 (9), p.1130-1137
Hauptverfasser: Ho, L. T. S., Lenihan, M., McVey, M. J., Karkouti, K., Callum, J., Wijeysundera, D. N., Rao, V., Crowther, M., Grocott, H. P., Pinto, R., Scales, D. C., Achen, B., Brar, S., Morrison, D., Wong, D., Bussières, J. S., Waal, T., Harle, C., Médicis, É., McAdams, C., Syed, S., Tran, D., Waters, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Haemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with prothrombotic complications. Although it is not possible to detect and quantify haemostatic activation directly, platelet dysfunction, as measured with point‐of‐care‐assays, may be a useful surrogate. In this study, we assessed the association between cardiopulmonary bypass‐associated platelet dysfunction and adverse outcomes in 3010 cardiac surgical patients. Platelet dysfunction, as measured near the end of the rewarming phase of cardiopulmonary bypass, was calculated as the proportion of non‐functional platelets after activation with collagen. Logistic regression and multivariable analyses were applied to assess the relationship between platelet dysfunction and a composite of in‐hospital death; myocardial infarction; stroke; deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism; and acute kidney injury (greater than a two‐fold increase in creatinine). The outcome occurred in 251 (8%) of 3010 patients. The median (IQR [range]) percentage platelet dysfunction was less for those without the outcome as compared with those with the outcome; 14% (8–28% [1–99%]) vs. 19% (11–45% [2–98%]), p 
ISSN:0003-2409
1365-2044
DOI:10.1111/anae.14631