Test-retest reliability of cerebral blood flow for assessing brain function at rest and during a vigilance task

Arterial spin labeled (ASL) perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to assess regional brain activity and cerebrovascular function in both healthy and clinical populations. ASL perfusion imaging provides a quantitative measure of regional brain activity by determining absolut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2019-06, Vol.193, p.157-166
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Fan Nils, Xu, Sihua, Spaeth, Andrea, Galli, Olga, Zhao, Ke, Fang, Zhuo, Basner, Mathias, Dinges, David F., Detre, John A., Rao, Hengyi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Arterial spin labeled (ASL) perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to assess regional brain activity and cerebrovascular function in both healthy and clinical populations. ASL perfusion imaging provides a quantitative measure of regional brain activity by determining absolute cerebral blood flow (CBF) values at a resting state or during task performance. However, the comparative reliability of these ASL measures is not well characterized. It is also unclear whether the test-retest reliability of absolute CBF or task-induced CBF change measures would be comparable to the reliability of task performance. In this study, fifteen healthy participants were scanned three times in a strictly controlled in-laboratory study while at rest and during performing a simple and reliable psychomotor vigilance test (PVT). The reliability of absolute CBF and task-induced CBF changes was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and compared to that of task performance. Absolute CBF showed excellent test-retest reliability across the three scans for both resting and PVT scans. The reliability of regional absolute CBF was comparable to that of behavioral measures of PVT performance, and was slightly higher during PVT scans as compared with resting scans. Task-induced regional CBF changes demonstrated only poor to moderate reliability across three scans. These findings suggest that absolute CBF measures are more reliable than task-induced CBF changes for characterizing regional brain function, especially for longitudinal and clinical studies. •Absolute CBF showed excellent test-retest reliability for both resting and task scans across three days.•Reliability of absolute CBF during the PVT across three scans is comparable to PVT performance reliability.•Reliability of absolute CBF during the PVT is slightly higher than that at a resting state.•Task-induced CBF changes have poor reliability as compared with absolute CBF measures and PVT performance.•Introduction.
ISSN:1053-8119
1095-9572
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.016