Diagnostic Accuracy of a Device for the Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in a Primary Care Setting

To determine the diagnostic accuracy in a real-world primary care setting of a deep learning-enhanced device for automated detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Retinal images of people with type 2 diabetes visiting a primary care screening program were graded by a hybrid deep learning-enhanced de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes care 2019-04, Vol.42 (4), p.651-656
Hauptverfasser: Verbraak, Frank D, Abramoff, Michael D, Bausch, Gonny C F, Klaver, Caroline, Nijpels, Giel, Schlingemann, Reinier O, van der Heijden, Amber A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine the diagnostic accuracy in a real-world primary care setting of a deep learning-enhanced device for automated detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Retinal images of people with type 2 diabetes visiting a primary care screening program were graded by a hybrid deep learning-enhanced device (IDx-DR-EU-2.1; IDx, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and its classification of retinopathy (vision-threatening [vt]DR, more than mild [mtm]DR, and mild or more [mom]DR) was compared with a reference standard. This reference standard consisted of grading according to the by the Rotterdam Study reading center. We determined the diagnostic accuracy of the hybrid deep learning-enhanced device (IDx-DR-EU-2.1) against the reference standard. A total of 1,616 people with type 2 diabetes were imaged. The hybrid deep learning-enhanced device's sensitivity/specificity against the reference standard was, respectively, for vtDR 100% (95% CI 77.1-100)/97.8% (95% CI 96.8-98.5) and for mtmDR 79.4% (95% CI 66.5-87.9)/93.8% (95% CI 92.1-94.9). The hybrid deep learning-enhanced device had high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of both vtDR (although the number of vtDR cases was low) and mtmDR in a primary care setting against an independent reading center. This allows its' safe use in a primary care setting.
ISSN:0149-5992
1935-5548
DOI:10.2337/dc18-0148