β2‐Adrenoceptors indirectly support impaired β1‐adrenoceptor responsiveness in the isolated type 2 diabetic rat heart

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Are there specific contributions of β1‐ and β2‐adrenoceptor subtypes to the impaired β‐adrenoceptor responsiveness of the type 2 diabetic heart? What is the main finding and its importance? In hearts isolated from the Zucker diabetic fatty rat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental physiology 2019-06, Vol.104 (6), p.808-818
Hauptverfasser: Cook, Rosalind F., Bussey, Carol T., Fomison‐Nurse, Ingrid C., Hughes, Gillian, Bahn, Andrew, Cragg, Patricia A., Lamberts, Regis R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:New Findings What is the central question of this study? Are there specific contributions of β1‐ and β2‐adrenoceptor subtypes to the impaired β‐adrenoceptor responsiveness of the type 2 diabetic heart? What is the main finding and its importance? In hearts isolated from the Zucker diabetic fatty rat model of type 2 diabetes, we showed that the β1‐adrenoceptors are the main subtype to regulate heart rate, contraction and relaxation. Notably, the β2‐adrenoceptor subtype actions seem to support function in the diabetic heart indirectly. Impaired β‐adrenoceptor (β‐AR) responsiveness causes cardiac vulnerability in patients with type 2 diabetes, but the independent contributions of β1‐ and β2‐AR subtypes to β‐AR‐associated cardiac dysfunction in diabetes are unknown. Our aim was to determine the specific β1‐ and β2‐AR responsiveness of heart rate (HR), contraction and relaxation in the diabetic heart. Isolated Langendorff‐perfused hearts of Zucker type 2 diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats were stimulated with the β‐AR agonist isoprenaline (1 × 10−11 to 3 × 10−8 mol l−1) with or without the selective β1‐AR antagonist CGP20712A (3 × 10−8 mol l−1) or the β2‐AR antagonist ICI‐118,551 (5 × 10−8 mol l−1), and HR, contraction and relaxation were measured. Diabetic hearts showed lower basal HR (non‐diabetic 216 ± 17 beats min−1 versus diabetic 151 ± 23 beats min−1, P 
ISSN:0958-0670
1469-445X
DOI:10.1113/EP087437