Assessment of the extracellular volume fraction for the grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: first results and histopathological findings

Objectives To assess the potential of T1 mapping–based extracellular volume fraction (ECV) for the identification of higher grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (cRCC), based on histopathology as the reference standard. Methods For this single-center, institutional review board–approved prospective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2019-11, Vol.29 (11), p.5832-5843
Hauptverfasser: Adams, Lisa C., Jurmeister, Philipp, Ralla, Bernhard, Bressem, Keno K., Fahlenkamp, Ute L., Engel, Guenther, Siepmann, Stefan, Wagner, Moritz, Hamm, Bernd, Busch, Jonas, Makowski, Marcus R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To assess the potential of T1 mapping–based extracellular volume fraction (ECV) for the identification of higher grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (cRCC), based on histopathology as the reference standard. Methods For this single-center, institutional review board–approved prospective study, 27 patients (17 men, median age 62 ± 12.4 years) with pathologic diagnosis of cRCC (nucleolar International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading) received abdominal MRI scans at 1.5 T using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence between January 2017 and June 2018. Quantitative T1 values were measured at different time points (pre- and postcontrast agent administration) and quantification of the ECV was performed on MRI and histological sections (H&E staining). Results Reduction in T1 value after contrast agent administration and MR-derived ECV were reliable predictors for differentiating higher from lower grade cRCC. Postcontrast T1 diff values (T1 diff  = T1 difference between the native and nephrogenic phase) and MR-derived ECV were significantly higher for higher grade cRCC (ISUP grades 3–4) compared with lower grade cRCC (ISUP grades 1–2) ( p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-019-06087-x