Inter-rater Variability in the Interpretation of Pre and Post Contrast MRI for Pre-Surgical Evaluation of Osteosarcoma in Long Bones in Pediatric Patients and Young Adults

The value of gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for extremity osteosarcoma resection planning is unverified. We evaluate the performance of intravenous gadolinium enhanced MRI for identification of neurovascular bundle involvement (NBI) and intraarticular extension (IAE) in patients with osteosarcoma. Two pediatric radiologists independently analyzed MRI examinations of patients with pathology proven extremity osteosarcoma for NBI and IAE. Initial evaluation utilized only non-contrast MRI images (PRE) and, after 2 weeks, subsequent evaluation included both the pre and post contrast images (POST). Cohen’s Kappa and McNemar’s test were calculated to assess agreement between PRE and POST image interpretations of NBI and IAE. 56 patients with 90 preoperative MRI examinations were analyzed. PRE and POST interpretations were rarely discordant; 4/90 cases for NBI (Kappa 0.91) and 2/90 cases for IAE (Kappa 0.95). McNemar’s test did not show a difference between PRE and POST imaging (NBI p=0.62; IAE p=0.48). No significant difference between PRE and POST image interpretation was found. A high level of agreement between PRE and POST image interpretation suggests that pre-contrast MRI may be sufficient for pre-surgical planning for pediatric patients with long bone osteosarcoma. •Gadolinium enhanced MRI may be unnecessary for extremity osteosarcoma resection planning.•Gadolinium enhanced MRI does not improve identification of intraarticular tumor spread or neurovascular bundle involvement.•Routine clinical use of gadolinium needs to be reassessed.