Ultrasound: A new approach to reduce phosphate content of meat emulsions
Meat emulsions with a reduction of 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of phosphate levels were produced. Soon after filling, the pieces were sonicated in an ultrasonic bath (normal mode, 60% amplitude, 25 KHz frequency, 230 W acoustic power, and 33 W L−1 volumetric power) for 0, 9, and 18 min. The technologica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Meat science 2019-06, Vol.152, p.88-95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Meat emulsions with a reduction of 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of phosphate levels were produced. Soon after filling, the pieces were sonicated in an ultrasonic bath (normal mode, 60% amplitude, 25 KHz frequency, 230 W acoustic power, and 33 W L−1 volumetric power) for 0, 9, and 18 min. The technological, oxidative, and sensory quality was evaluated. The reduction of the phosphate content in the non-sonicated samples led to a decrease in the cooking yield and emulsion stability and impaired the texture profile, and the oxidative and sensory quality of the samples. Although the 9-min ultrasound treatment was not effective to compensate for defects caused by the phosphate reduction, the application for 18 min improved the technological quality and did not increase the lipid oxidation. In addition, it allowed reducing most of the sensory defects caused by the reduction of 50% of the phosphate level. Therefore, the US can be useful to produce low-phosphate meat emulsions.
•Meat batters with reduced phosphate levels were produced.•Meat batters were sonicated in an ultrasonic (US) bath for 0, 9 and 18 min.•18-min US application reduced the technological defects caused by phosphate reduction.•US application did not increase the lipid oxidation.•Sensory defects caused by phosphate reduction were reduced by 18-min US application. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0309-1740 1873-4138 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.02.010 |