Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion is associated with kinematic but not kinetic variables related to bilateral drop-landing performance at various drop heights

•Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DF ROM) does not influence landing forces.•Reduced ankle DF ROM alters coordination patterns during bilateral landings.•Strategies to compensate for ankle DF ROM restriction may increase injury risk. Limited evidence is available concerning ankle dorsiflexion ran...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human movement science 2019-04, Vol.64, p.320-328
Hauptverfasser: Howe, Louis P., Bampouras, Theodoros M., North, Jamie, Waldron, Mark
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DF ROM) does not influence landing forces.•Reduced ankle DF ROM alters coordination patterns during bilateral landings.•Strategies to compensate for ankle DF ROM restriction may increase injury risk. Limited evidence is available concerning ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DF ROM) and its relationship with landing performance from varying drop heights. The aim of this investigation was to determine the relationship between ankle DF ROM and both kinetic and kinematic variables measured during bilateral drop-landings from 50%, 100% and 150% of countermovement jump height. Thirty-nine participants were measured for their ankle DF ROM using the weight-bearing lunge test, after which five bilateral drop-landings were performed from 50%, 100% and 150% of maximal countermovement jump height. Normalized peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), time to peak vGRF and loading rate was calculated for analysis, alongside sagittal-plane initial contact angles, peak angles and joint displacement for the hip, knee and ankle. Frontal-plane projection angles were also calculated. Ankle DF ROM was not related to normalized peak vGRF, time to peak vGRF or loading rate (P > 0.05), regardless of the drop height. However, at drop heights of 100% and 150% of countermovement jump height, there were numerous significant (P 
ISSN:0167-9457
1872-7646
DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2019.02.016