Validation of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) in eating disorders' patients
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) in eating disorders (ED) patients. Method The CIA is a 16-item brief self-reported instrument developed to assess psychosocial impairment secondary to EDs...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Eating and weight disorders 2020-06, Vol.25 (3), p.627-635 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) in eating disorders (ED) patients. Method The CIA is a 16-item brief self-reported instrument developed to assess psychosocial impairment secondary to EDs. The CIA was administered to a clinical sample of 237 women with EDs and a college sample of 196 women. The clinical sample completed the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory and the Outcome-45 Questionnaire. Reliability, confirmatory factor analysis, validity, and clinically significant change were calculated. Results Confirmatory factor analysis validated the original 3-factor structure showing an adequate model fit. CIA showed good psychometric properties with high internal consistency, good convergent validity with the EDE-Q, the OQ-45, and the BDI. For divergent validity, participants CIA scores in the clinical sample were significantly higher than in the non-clinical sample. ROC curve analysis provided a cutoff of 15. For known-groups validity participants' scoring above CIA cutoff reported significantly higher CIA scores. In addition, non-underweight participants and participants reporting the presence of dysfunctional ED behaviors had significantly higher CIA scores. Finally, for clinically significant change, a reliable change index of 5 points was obtained to consider a reliable change in the CIA global score. Conclusions Our findings support the validity and clinical utility of the CIA as a good self-report measure to be used in both clinical and research settings.
This research was partially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia/Foundation for Science and Technology through a European Union COMPETE program through a grant to a post-doctoral scholarship to Ana Vaz (SFRH/BPD/94490/2013), a Grant to Eva Conceição (IF/01219/2014) and a doctoral scholarship to Ana Pinto-Bastos (SFRH/BD/104159/2014) and financed by FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement (UID/PSI/01662/2013). The funding body had no role in the design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1590-1262 1124-4909 1590-1262 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40519-019-00661-4 |