Bleeding and spotting with the levonorgestrel 13.5 mg intrauterine system: the impact of insertion timing

To assess the impact of early versus late menstrual cycle insertion on bleeding/spotting in the 90 days following levonorgestrel (LNG) 13.5 mg intrauterine system (IUS) insertion. In this observational study, participants received a LNG 13.5 mg IUS and provided 90 days of bleeding/spotting data by a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contraception (Stoneham) 2019-06, Vol.99 (6), p.340-344
Hauptverfasser: Shimoni, Noa'a, Choudhury, Tasmiah, Goldman, Alice R., Frondelli, Michelle, Chen, Ping-Hsin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess the impact of early versus late menstrual cycle insertion on bleeding/spotting in the 90 days following levonorgestrel (LNG) 13.5 mg intrauterine system (IUS) insertion. In this observational study, participants received a LNG 13.5 mg IUS and provided 90 days of bleeding/spotting data by answering the following daily text: “Have you had no flow (0), spotting (1), or bleeding (2) today?” We dichotomized insertion timing as early (days 1–7 from last menstrual period) and late (remainder of menstrual cycle) and compared bleeding/spotting between the two groups in the 90- and 30-day reference periods. We used multivariate regression methods to study associations between cycle day at insertion, parity, historical bleeding, recent hormonal contraceptive use and bleeding/spotting. In the 90-day dichotomous analysis (n=125), we found no differences in the number of days of bleeding/spotting, bleeding or spotting between the early and late insertion groups. In the 30-day dichotomous analysis (n=131), early insertion was associated with fewer days of bleeding than late insertion (5±3 vs. 7±4 days, p
ISSN:0010-7824
1879-0518
DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.004