Disproval of the Starch-Amyloplast Hypothesis?
In a recent publication, Edelmann (Protoplasma 2018; 255,1877–1881) refuted the well-established starch-amyloplast hypothesis of gravitropism in plants. Gravitropic curvatures of shoots and roots were still present after amyloplast-containing tissues (in sheath of vascular bundles and root caps) wer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trends in plant science 2019-04, Vol.24 (4), p.291-293 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In a recent publication, Edelmann (Protoplasma 2018; 255,1877–1881) refuted the well-established starch-amyloplast hypothesis of gravitropism in plants. Gravitropic curvatures of shoots and roots were still present after amyloplast-containing tissues (in sheath of vascular bundles and root caps) were dissected. Here, we discuss Edelmann’s data in the light of Popper’s falsification principle. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1360-1385 1878-4372 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.02.008 |