Something’s lost, but something’s gained: On‐site evaluation, telecytology, and the cytopathologist

The use of telecytology for rapid on‐site evaluation (ROSE) can have benefits, but may create losses as well. While acknowledging the potential benefits, this commentary outlines some of those losses and highlights gains that can be achieved when cytopathologists go into the field for ROSE.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Cancer cytopathology 2019-04, Vol.127 (4), p.222-224
1. Verfasser:	Gutmann, Edward J.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Biopsy Cellular biology Cytodiagnosis - methods Cytological Techniques - standards cytopathologists Evaluation Studies as Topic fine needle aspiration biopsy Humans medical humanities Neoplasms - diagnosis Pathologists - standards Pathology Quality Assurance, Health Care rapid on‐site evaluation (ROSE) Specimen Handling - standards telecytology Telepathology - standards
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	The use of telecytology for rapid on‐site evaluation (ROSE) can have benefits, but may create losses as well. While acknowledging the potential benefits, this commentary outlines some of those losses and highlights gains that can be achieved when cytopathologists go into the field for ROSE.
ISSN:	1934-662X 1934-6638
DOI:	10.1002/cncy.22111