Aortic 4D flow MRI in 2 minutes using compressed sensing, respiratory controlled adaptive k‐space reordering, and inline reconstruction

Purpose To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of a free‐breathing 4D flow technique using compressed sensing (CS), where 4D flow imaging of the thoracic aorta is performed in 2 min with inline image reconstruction on the MRI scanner in less than 5 min. Methods The 10 in vitro 4D flow MRI scans we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2019-06, Vol.81 (6), p.3675-3690
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Liliana E., Markl, Michael, Chow, Kelvin, Huh, Hyungkyu, Forman, Christoph, Vali, Alireza, Greiser, Andreas, Carr, James, Schnell, Susanne, Barker, Alex J., Jin, Ning
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of a free‐breathing 4D flow technique using compressed sensing (CS), where 4D flow imaging of the thoracic aorta is performed in 2 min with inline image reconstruction on the MRI scanner in less than 5 min. Methods The 10 in vitro 4D flow MRI scans were performed with different acceleration rates on a pulsatile flow phantom (9 CS acceleration factors [R = 5.4–14.1], 1 generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition [GRAPPA] R = 2). Based on in vitro results, CS‐accelerated 4D flow of the thoracic aorta was acquired in 20 healthy volunteers (38.3 ± 15.2 years old) and 11 patients with aortic disease (61.3 ± 15.1 years) with R = 7.7. A conventional 4D flow scan was acquired with matched spatial coverage and temporal resolution. Results CS depicted similar hemodynamics to conventional 4D flow in vitro, and in vivo, with >70% reduction in scan time (volunteers: 1:52 ± 0:25 versus 7:25 ± 2:35 min). Net flow values were within 3.5% in healthy volunteers, and voxel‐by‐voxel comparison demonstrated good agreement. CS significantly underestimated peak velocities (vmax) and peak flow (Qmax) in both volunteers and patients (volunteers: vmax, −16.2% to −9.4%, Qmax: −11.6% to −2.9%, patients: vmax, −11.2% to −4.0%; Qmax, −10.2% to −5.8%). Conclusion Aortic 4D flow with CS is feasible in a two minute scan with less than 5 min for inline reconstruction. While net flow agreement was excellent, CS with R = 7.7 produced underestimation of Qmax and vmax; however, these were generally within 13% of conventional 4D flow‐derived values. This approach allows 4D flow to be feasible in clinical practice for comprehensive assessment of hemodynamics.
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.27684