Aortic 4D flow MRI in 2 minutes using compressed sensing, respiratory controlled adaptive k‐space reordering, and inline reconstruction
Purpose To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of a free‐breathing 4D flow technique using compressed sensing (CS), where 4D flow imaging of the thoracic aorta is performed in 2 min with inline image reconstruction on the MRI scanner in less than 5 min. Methods The 10 in vitro 4D flow MRI scans we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2019-06, Vol.81 (6), p.3675-3690 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of a free‐breathing 4D flow technique using compressed sensing (CS), where 4D flow imaging of the thoracic aorta is performed in 2 min with inline image reconstruction on the MRI scanner in less than 5 min.
Methods
The 10 in vitro 4D flow MRI scans were performed with different acceleration rates on a pulsatile flow phantom (9 CS acceleration factors [R = 5.4–14.1], 1 generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition [GRAPPA] R = 2). Based on in vitro results, CS‐accelerated 4D flow of the thoracic aorta was acquired in 20 healthy volunteers (38.3 ± 15.2 years old) and 11 patients with aortic disease (61.3 ± 15.1 years) with R = 7.7. A conventional 4D flow scan was acquired with matched spatial coverage and temporal resolution.
Results
CS depicted similar hemodynamics to conventional 4D flow in vitro, and in vivo, with >70% reduction in scan time (volunteers: 1:52 ± 0:25 versus 7:25 ± 2:35 min). Net flow values were within 3.5% in healthy volunteers, and voxel‐by‐voxel comparison demonstrated good agreement. CS significantly underestimated peak velocities (vmax) and peak flow (Qmax) in both volunteers and patients (volunteers: vmax, −16.2% to −9.4%, Qmax: −11.6% to −2.9%, patients: vmax, −11.2% to −4.0%; Qmax, −10.2% to −5.8%).
Conclusion
Aortic 4D flow with CS is feasible in a two minute scan with less than 5 min for inline reconstruction. While net flow agreement was excellent, CS with R = 7.7 produced underestimation of Qmax and vmax; however, these were generally within 13% of conventional 4D flow‐derived values. This approach allows 4D flow to be feasible in clinical practice for comprehensive assessment of hemodynamics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mrm.27684 |