Is early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma truly early: stage migration on final pathology with surgery-first versus neoadjuvant therapy sequencing
Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) remains controversial in early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), defined as clinical (c)Stage I-II. Our aim was to analyze rates of pathologic upstaging/downstaging for resectable PDAC treated with surgery-first (SF) vs. NT. Utilizing the National Cancer Data Ba...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | HPB (Oxford, England) England), 2019-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1203-1210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) remains controversial in early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), defined as clinical (c)Stage I-II. Our aim was to analyze rates of pathologic upstaging/downstaging for resectable PDAC treated with surgery-first (SF) vs. NT.
Utilizing the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), patients with cStage I-II PDAC who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in 2006–2013 were pathologically staged using the AJCC 8th edition and compared by treatment sequencing.
Among 13,871 patients, 15.3% received NT. Despite higher pre-treatment T-stage (cT2: 71.9% vs. 56.3%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1365-182X 1477-2574 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.011 |