Diagnosis and Surgical Outcomes of Facial Asymmetry According to the Occlusal Cant and Menton Deviation

Morphologic differences and surgical outcomes were compared between the ipsilateral type of facial asymmetry, in which the menton deviates to the side of the upward frontal occlusal plane (FOP) cant (FOPUP), and the contralateral type, in which the menton deviates to the side of the downward FOP can...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2019-06, Vol.77 (6), p.1261-1275
Hauptverfasser: Kwon, Sun Mi, Baik, Hyoung-Seon, Jung, Hwi-Dong, Jang, Woowon, Choi, Yoon Jeong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Morphologic differences and surgical outcomes were compared between the ipsilateral type of facial asymmetry, in which the menton deviates to the side of the upward frontal occlusal plane (FOP) cant (FOPUP), and the contralateral type, in which the menton deviates to the side of the downward FOP cant (FOPDOWN), by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. This retrospective study included consecutive patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry who had undergone bimaxillary orthognathic surgery and serial CBCT before, 1 month after, and 1 year after surgery. CBCT images were reconstructed and analyzed for predictor (group and timing) and outcome (CBCT measurements over time) variables. The data were analyzed using independent t tests and paired t tests. The contralateral group (n = 12) was selected first; the ipsilateral group (n = 12) was selected by matching age, gender, and degree of FOP cant with those of the contralateral group. Before surgery, in the ipsilateral group, the ramal length was longer on the nondeviated (N-Dev) side than on the deviated (Dev) side (P  .05). In the contralateral group, the ramal length was longer on the Dev side (P 
ISSN:0278-2391
1531-5053
DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.028