Modulation of Sympathetic Activity and Innervation With Chronic Ivabradine and β-Blocker Therapies: Analysis of Hypertensive Rats With Heart Failure

Background: Whether the reduction of heart rate with ivabradine (IVA) could affect sympathetic activation and cardiac innervation in heart failure (HF) remains unknown. Purpose: The present study assessed the chronic effects of IVA and β-blocker on the systemic and local sympathetic nervous systems...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics 2019-07, Vol.24 (4), p.387-396
Hauptverfasser: Kakehi, Kazuyoshi, Iwanaga, Yoshitaka, Watanabe, Heitaro, Sonobe, Takashi, Akiyama, Tsuyoshi, Shimizu, Shuji, Yamamoto, Hiromi, Miyazaki, Shunichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Whether the reduction of heart rate with ivabradine (IVA) could affect sympathetic activation and cardiac innervation in heart failure (HF) remains unknown. Purpose: The present study assessed the chronic effects of IVA and β-blocker on the systemic and local sympathetic nervous systems of hypertensive animals with HF. Methods and Results: The Dahl salt-sensitive rats received chronic IVA, bisoprolol (BIS), or placebo (CTL) therapy. The survival of the animal models with IVA and BIS significantly improved (median; 19.7 in IVA and 19.7 in BIS vs 17.0 weeks in CTL, P < .001). A similar decrease in 24-hour heart rate (mean; 305 in IVA and 329 in BIS vs 388 beats/min in CTL, P < .001) without effect on blood pressure, and an improvement in the left ventricular dysfunction (mean fractional shortening; 56.7% in IVA and 47.8% in BIS vs 39.0% in CTL, P < .001) were observed in the animals with IVA and BIS. However, a negative inotropic effect was only observed in the animals with BIS. Excessive urinary noradrenaline excretion in animals with CTL was only suppressed with the use of IVA (mean; 1.35 μg/d in IVA and 1.95 μg/d in BIS vs 2.27 μg/d in CTL, P = .002). In contrast, atrial noradrenaline and acetylcholine depletion in the animals with CTL improved and the tyrosine hydroxylase expression in the both atria were restored with the use of both IVA and BIS. Conclusions: IVA therapy improved the survival of hypertensive animals with HF. Furthermore, it was associated with the amelioration of systemic sympathetic activation and cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve innervations. Chronic β-blocker therapy with negative inotropic effects had beneficial effects only on cardiac innervations.
ISSN:1074-2484
1940-4034
DOI:10.1177/1074248419829168