Conditioning electrical stimulation promotes functional nerve regeneration

Peripheral nerve regeneration following injury is often incomplete, resulting in significant personal and socioeconomic costs. Although a conditioning crush lesion prior to surgical nerve transection and repair greatly promotes nerve regeneration and functional recovery, feasibility and ethical considerations have hindered its clinical applicability. In a recent proof of principle study, we demonstrated that conditioning electrical stimulation (CES) had effects on early nerve regeneration, similar to that seen in conditioning crush lesions (CCL). To convincingly determine its clinical utility, establishing the effects of CES on target reinnervation and functional outcomes is of utmost importance. In this study, we found that CES improved nerve regeneration and reinnervation well beyond that of CCL. Specifically, compared to CCL, CES resulted in greater intraepidermal skin and NMJ reinnervation, and greater physiological and functional recovery including mechanosensation, compound muscle action potential on nerve conduction studies, normalization of gait pattern, and motor performance on the horizontal ladder test. These findings have direct clinical relevance as CES could be delivered at the bedside before scheduled nerve surgery. •Conditioning crush lesions promote sensorimotor nerve regeneration but are not clinically feasible.•Conditioning electrical stimulation promotes nerve regeneration and sensorimotor recovery superior to the conditioning crush.•Electrical stimulation is clinically safe, well-tolerated, and can be performed prior to a scheduled nerve repair surgery.•Conditioning electrical stimulation may significantly improve clinical outcomes for patients with peripheral nerve injuries.