Effects of the reinforced cellulose nanocrystals on glass-ionomer cements

•Mechanical and chemical properties of GICs modified with cellulose nanocrystals were evaluated.•The CN reinforcement significantly improved the mechanical properties and significantly increased the F− release of all GICs.•It was not possible to identify by FTIR any chemical bond difference in the n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dental materials 2019-04, Vol.35 (4), p.564-573
Hauptverfasser: Menezes-Silva, Rafael, de Oliveira, Bruna Medeiros Bertol, Fernandes, Paulo Henrique Martins, Shimohara, Lívia Yukari, Pereira, Fabiano Vargas, Borges, Ana Flávia Sanches, Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo, Pascotto, Renata Corrêa, Sidhu, Sharanbir K., de Lima Navarro, Maria Fidela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Mechanical and chemical properties of GICs modified with cellulose nanocrystals were evaluated.•The CN reinforcement significantly improved the mechanical properties and significantly increased the F− release of all GICs.•It was not possible to identify by FTIR any chemical bond difference in the new compounds formed.•Modification of GICs with CNs appears to produce promising restorative materials. Glass-ionomer cements (GICs) modified with cellulose nanocrystals (CNs) were characterized and evaluated for compressive strength (CS), diametral tensile strength (DTS) and fluoride release (F−). Commercially available GICs (Maxxion, Vidrion R, Vitro Molar, Ketac Molar Easy Mix and Fuji Gold Label 9) were reinforced with CNs (0.2% by weight). The microstructure of CNs and of CN-modified GICs were evaluated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) while chemical characterization was by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Ten specimens each of the unmodified (control) and CN-modified materials (test materials) were prepared for CS and DTS testing. For the fluoride release evaluation, separate specimens (n=10) of each test and control material were made. The results obtained were submitted to the t-test (p
ISSN:0109-5641
1879-0097
DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.006