A comparison of the efficacy of multiple ultraviolet light room decontamination devices in a radiology procedure room
To evaluate the efficacy of multiple ultraviolet (UV) light decontamination devices in a radiology procedure room. Laboratory evaluation. We compared the efficacy of 8 UV decontamination devices with a 4-minute UV exposure time in reducing recovery of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRS...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2019-02, Vol.40 (2), p.158-163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To evaluate the efficacy of multiple ultraviolet (UV) light decontamination devices in a radiology procedure room.
Laboratory evaluation.
We compared the efficacy of 8 UV decontamination devices with a 4-minute UV exposure time in reducing recovery of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and Clostridium difficile spores on steel disk carriers placed at 5 sites on a computed tomography patient table. Analysis of variance was used to compare reductions for the different devices. A spectrometer was used to obtain irradiance measurements for the devices.
Four standard vertical tower low-pressure mercury devices achieved 2 log10CFU or greater reductions in VRE and MRSA and ~1 log10CFU reductions in C. difficile spores, whereas a pulsed-xenon device resulted in less reduction in the pathogens (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0899-823X 1559-6834 |
DOI: | 10.1017/ice.2018.296 |