Validity of an Interval Taekwondo-Specific Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test

ABSTRACTAraujo, MP, Soares, PP, Hausen, MR, Julio, HS, Porto, F, and Gurgel, JL. Validity of an interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2018—The objective of this study is to propose and validate an interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2021-07, Vol.35 (7), p.1956-1963
Hauptverfasser: Araujo, Marcus P., Soares, Pedro P., Hausen, Matheus R., Julio, Hilbert S., Porto, Flávia, Gurgel, Jonas L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACTAraujo, MP, Soares, PP, Hausen, MR, Julio, HS, Porto, F, and Gurgel, JL. Validity of an interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2018—The objective of this study is to propose and validate an interval taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test (ITKDtest) and compare it with running cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and a continuous taekwondo-specific cardiopulmonary exercise test (CTKDtest). Fifteen athletes (age 22 ± 4 years; body mass 71.1 ± 10.2 kg; height 178.14 ± 8.3 cm; and body mass index 22.4 ± 2.4 kg·m) performed CPET, CTKDtest, and ITKDtest on a counterbalanced order. Oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2), heart rate (HR), and ventilatory thresholds (VTs 1 and 2) were measured during the 3 tests. ITKDtest started at 30 kicks per minute and increased 10 kicks each 2 minutes, with a period of passive recovery, lasting 1 minute. Interval protocol design simulated the temporal structure of an official taekwondo fight. Significant difference between specific tests was found for V[Combining Dot Above]O2 VT1 (p = 0.03), V[Combining Dot Above]O2 VT1 (%V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak) (p = 0.009), V[Combining Dot Above]O2 VT2 (p = 0.005), and V[Combining Dot Above]O2 VT2 (%V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak) (p = 0.013). Reliability was considered “excellent” for V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak (α = 0.902; SEM = 0.179), “good” for V[Combining Dot Above]O2 VT1 (α = 0.708; SEM = 3.823) and HRpeak (α = 0.803; SEM = 2.987), and “fair” for V[Combining Dot Above]O2 VT2 (α = 0.659; SEM = 4.498) and HR VT2 (α = 0.580; SEM = 8.868). Bland-Altman analyses reported a mean difference of 2.9 ± 6.6 ml·kg·min (CPET-ITKDtest) and 1.4 ± 6.1 ml·kg·min (CTKDtest-ITKDtest). ITKDtest may be used for measurement of cardiorespiratory variables commonly used in exercise prescription, whereas CTKDtest seems to be a more appropriate method to assess V[Combining Dot Above]O2 and HR at VTs.
ISSN:1064-8011
1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002988