Geriatric Acetabular Surgery: Letournelʼs Contraindications Then and Now—Data From the German Pelvic Registry

OBJECTIVE:In his original series of 129 surgically treated acetabular fractures, Letournel did not operate on patients older than 60 years. Almost 30 years later, he still emphasized that no patients with reduced bone quality should be operated on. The aim of the study was to analyze epidemiologic characteristics and treatment modes for todayʼs cohort of elderly patients with acetabular fractures. DESIGN:Retrospective analysis. SETTING:Multicenter registry/Level I trauma center. PATIENTS:Three thousand seven hundred ninety-three patients who had sustained a fracture of the acetabulum. INTERVENTION:Operative and nonoperative treatment of acetabular fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:Epidemiologic characteristics, treatment mode, in-hospital mortality, rate of secondary hip arthroplasty, and quality of life indicated by EQ-5D score. RESULTS:For the multicenter registry, more than 50% of all patients with acetabular fractures had an age of 60 years or over. The age peak was found at 75–80 years. Fifty percent of the elderly patients were treated surgically. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in elderly patients than patients younger than 60 years. In our Level I trauma center, surgical treatment by open reduction and internal fixation did not influence in-hospital mortality or quality of life of elderly patients with acetabular fractures. CONCLUSIONS:Today, elderly persons represent the dominant cohort among patients with fractures of the acetabulum. Fifty-five years after the publication of Letournelʼs original case series, data indicate that currently, surgical treatment is a common and necessary option in the therapy of acetabular fractures in elderly patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.