Comparison of an Er: YAG laser osteotome versus a conventional drill for the use in osteo‐ odonto‐keratoprosthesis (OOKP)

Objectives The osteo‐odonto‐kerato‐prosthesis (OOKP) procedure is a complex, multi‐stage, multidisciplinary surgical intervention for the treatment of severe corneal blindness. One step of the OOKP consists of creating a precise hole into a tooth in which an optic cylinder is subsequently inserted;...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2019-08, Vol.51 (6), p.531-537
Hauptverfasser: Berg, Britt‐Isabelle, Peyer, Michael, Kuske, Lorenz, Augello, Marcello, Schötzau, Andreas, Steineck, Markus, Deibel, Waldemar, Mathys, Daniel, Jürgens, Philipp, Kunz, Christoph, Goldblum, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The osteo‐odonto‐kerato‐prosthesis (OOKP) procedure is a complex, multi‐stage, multidisciplinary surgical intervention for the treatment of severe corneal blindness. One step of the OOKP consists of creating a precise hole into a tooth in which an optic cylinder is subsequently inserted; its shape must ensure a perfect watertight fit. The Er: YAG laser (L) used in this study is part of CARLO®, the first laser osteotome that enables surgical planning based on computed tomography data, robot guidance, and a precise execution of laser cuts in teeth and bone tissue, using laser photoablation rather than conventional mechanical methods. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the Er: YAG laser is non‐inferior compared to a conventional drill. Methods Thirty‐two bovine incisors were grounded to a thickness of 1.5 mm. In 16 teeth, a 3.5 mm hole was drilled progressively into each tooth, using dental burs (B) of increasing diameter that were attached to a fixed drill machine. In the other 16 teeth, a hole was created using an Er: YAG laser at a wavelength of 2.94 µm (Part of CARLO®). In seven teeth of each group, the cylinder was inserted and fixated with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. In the remaining seven teeth of each group, the cylinder was inserted without fixation material (press‐fit). After bonding and drying, all specimens were stored in water until force measurements were recorded using a uniaxial traction machine. The force required to move the optical cylinder out of the hole in the tooth was measured using an Instron 3344 testing system. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and light microscope (LM) visualization of the holes created with the laser and the drill were performed in two teeth (SEM)/four teeth (LM) per method. Results Significant differences (P 
ISSN:0196-8092
1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.23053