Evaluation of body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas and an intermediate phenotype: Is there an association with metabolic syndrome?

Purpose Metabolic syndrome (MS) and sarcopenia are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. No studies using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) have evaluated association between body composition (BC) changes and MS in adrenal incidentaloma (AI). Our aim was to analyse BC in non-functionin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endocrinological investigation 2019-07, Vol.42 (7), p.797-807
Hauptverfasser: Moraes, A. B., Cavalari, E. M. R., de Paula, M. P., Arruda, M., Curi, D. S. C., Leitão, R. A., de Mendonça, L. M. C., Farias, M. L. F., Madeira, M., Vieira Neto, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Metabolic syndrome (MS) and sarcopenia are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. No studies using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) have evaluated association between body composition (BC) changes and MS in adrenal incidentaloma (AI). Our aim was to analyse BC in non-functioning AI (NFAI) and intermediate phenotype (IP) relative to controls and to correlate with cortisol levels. Methods Cross-sectional study with 44 NFAI (serum cortisol ≤ 50 nmol/L after the overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test), 27 IP (cortisol 51–138 nmol/L), and 41 controls (normal adrenal on imaging examination) using DXA. Autonomic cortisol secretion (cortisol > 138 nmol/L) was excluded from the study. BC data were compared using criteria for MS (World Health Organization, National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel-III, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), and International Diabetes Federation). Results There was no significant difference in clinical data and body mass index (BMI) among the three groups. Waist circumference (WC) was larger in AI vs. controls ( p  
ISSN:1720-8386
0391-4097
1720-8386
DOI:10.1007/s40618-018-0985-y